Sellers of charging accessories in the Indonesian market have most likely heard of SDPPI certification: some say all chargers require it, some say wireless chargers must have it, and others say USB-C cables need it — there are all kinds of claims. A misjudgment will either result in wasted certification fees or goods being detained at customs. Today, we will thoroughly explain the applicable scope of SDPPI, especially the boundaries related to charging products. After reading this, you can make a preliminary judgment on your own and avoid many pitfalls.
First, Understand What SDPPI Is
First, let’s clarify the basic concepts to avoid confusion. SDPPI is the long-used name for telecommunications equipment certification in the Indonesian market, and it was also commonly referred to as POSTEL certification in the past. Current telecommunications equipment certification shall be subject to the regulations, application systems, and certification results issued by the Ministry of Communications and Digital Affairs of Indonesia (Komdigi) and its competent authority for digital infrastructure. You can no longer search only by the old agency name Kominfo. The relevant competent authority has a certification database available for inquiry.
This certification mainly targets products that are recognized as telecommunications tools or telecommunications equipment under Indonesian regulations and are included in the scope of corresponding certification or technical requirements. Whether a device emits wireless signals is only one of the judgment factors and cannot be used alone as the final conclusion. It must also be judged in combination with the device’s purpose, communication medium, technical requirements, equipment category, and current certification rules.
This is particularly important for friends who sell charging products: not all charging products require SDPPI-related certification. Pure charging and pure power supply products that are confirmed not to be telecommunications equipment requiring certification under current regulatory classification are usually not related to SDPPI. If you misjudge — for example, applying for certification when it is not applicable — you will unnecessarily increase costs; if you fail to do what is required, it may affect import and sales, and even lead to goods being detained.
As for the certification fees and cycles that everyone cares about, they cannot be simply calculated based on product power or frequency bands. Official certification fees shall be checked against current non-tax revenue charging standards and certification methods; fees and processing cycles for laboratory testing, samples, translation, agency services, and document preparation may vary depending on product category, testing requirements, document completeness, and whether additional testing is required.
Core Judgment Logic: 4-Step Preliminary Screening
How do you specifically judge whether a product requires SDPPI? The following four steps can only be used as a preliminary screening and cannot replace the official judgment of the competent authority. The fact that a product is not on a certain public list does not mean it can be self-determined as exempt from certification; you must also confirm whether it is a telecommunications tool or telecommunications equipment defined by regulations, and whether there are corresponding technical requirements, certification categories, exclusion clauses, or other certification paths.
Step 1: Check for Telecommunications/Communication Functions
The “communication function” here does not mean any “ability to transmit data” as commonly understood. Instead, it depends on the functions of telecommunications tools or equipment covered by Indonesian regulations, and whether the product uses regulated radio, communication networks, or other regulated communication methods. Common functions that require key verification include Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, FM radio reception or transmission, cellular networks (2G/3G/4G/5G), RFID (Radio Frequency Identification), PLC (Power Line Communication, i.e., transmitting network signals through electrical wires), and some special wired data interactions.
For charging products, ordinary USB data transmission between devices, pure power conversion, and wireless power supply without regulated radio or telecommunications functions usually do not trigger SDPPI solely due to these functions themselves. However, the “ordinary USB data transmission” here shall be limited to data exchange between ordinary interfaces, and cannot be generalized to USB Ethernet, cellular network terminals, or other network communication devices. There may be negotiation communication in the power supply control of Qi wireless chargers, and a conclusion cannot be drawn directly without considering the specific implementation and current technical requirements.
It should be reminded that: not all products with “data transmission” functions require certification, and not all products without external antennas have no communication functions. Many products with built-in modules have antennas hidden inside the body, so you cannot judge only by appearance.
Step 2: Check Whether It Falls Under Telecommunications Equipment Categories Requiring Verification
Even if a product has communication functions, you cannot judge whether it requires SDPPI solely by the function name. You must also check the corresponding equipment category, technical requirements, and certification method based on whether the product is a telecommunications tool or telecommunications equipment defined by regulations.
A core purpose of charging does not automatically exclude certification obligations. Complete devices with functions such as Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, cellular, and NFC still need to be verified based on the specific equipment category, communication module, frequency band, technical requirements, and the current judgment of the competent authority. The fact that a product is not listed on a certain public list can only be used as a preliminary clue and cannot alone prove that the product is exempt from certification.
Step 3: Check Whether Communication Parameters and Technical Specifications Meet Requirements
If the product is indeed a device that requires certification or is subject to relevant technical requirements, it also depends on whether the communication parameters and technical specifications meet Indonesia’s requirements — for example, whether the frequency band used is allowed in Indonesia, whether the transmit power exceeds the requirements, and whether the technical standards (such as Bluetooth version, Wi-Fi protocol) comply with local regulations. It should be noted here that just because a frequency band is in Indonesia’s plan does not mean there is no problem; it must also be evaluated in combination with the equipment category, purpose, and specific technical requirements.
Step 4: Check Whether It Falls Under Non-applicable, Excluded, or Exempt Situations
Finally, check whether there are non-applicable, excluded, or exempt situations, which are mainly divided into three types:
The first type is products that are confirmed by regulatory classification not to be telecommunications tools or telecommunications equipment requiring certification, and there are no other applicable certification requirements. You cannot self-determine that a product is exempt from certification from the outset just because it is not listed on a certain public list.
The second type is categories or scenarios that are clearly listed as exempt in regulations. You must check the specific regulation numbers and applicable conditions, and cannot believe it just because others say “a certain product is exempt”.
The third type is temporary import facilitation, such as samples for display, testing, R&D, or maintenance. Such situations must be applied for in accordance with current telecommunications equipment regulations or obtain approval, registration, or exemption documents prescribed by the competent authority, and simultaneously meet conditions such as customs, quantity, purpose, and time limit; you cannot determine that formal certification is exempt just because you have customs permission to import.
There is a very common misconception to mention in advance: Indonesia does not have a unified “low-power automatic exemption” rule. Do not think that low-power products definitely do not require certification. Even low-power devices must be checked against specific regulatory requirements.
Applicable Boundaries of Common Charging Products
After explaining the general judgment logic, we will break down the most frequently asked charging products one by one to see which usually do not require certification and which require key review. The following conclusions are all preliminary judgments, on the premise that the product has been confirmed not to be telecommunications equipment requiring certification according to current regulations, or there are no other applicable technical requirements.
Wired Chargers/Power Adapters
As the core category, the judgment of wired chargers is usually relatively simple: if they only perform pure voltage conversion, only have wired fast charging, have no regulated radio or telecommunications communication functions, and are confirmed not to be telecommunications equipment requiring certification under current regulatory classification, they are usually not applicable to SDPPI.
Common ordinary USB-A/C port PD fast chargers, multi-port desktop chargers, and pure physical travel adapters (only change the plug shape, no circuit conversion) usually fall into this category.
If your charger has built-in wireless communication functions such as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, or cellular networks, or has PLC (Power Line Communication), or integrates active wired communication functions that require verification, then key evaluation is required. The fact that the core purpose of the product is power supply cannot automatically exclude certification obligations.
Here are a few commonly used but actually invalid bases for judgment that need special mention: having “smart”, “fast charging”, or “travel adapter” in the product name, having no external antenna, and judging only by HS code — none of these count. Names can be chosen arbitrarily, antennas can be built-in, and HS codes are only classifications for import declarations, none of which can replace the applicability judgment of SDPPI.
If you are unsure, you need to collect the whole device bill of materials (BOM), circuit schematic diagram, function description/user manual, and interface definition/fast charging protocol description to confirm whether there are regulated communication functions and what equipment category the product belongs to.
Charging Cables/Interface Adapters
The preliminary conclusion for charging cables and adapters is also very clear: purely passive products that are only used for power transmission or ordinary wired data transmission between devices, and are confirmed not to be telecommunications equipment requiring certification under current regulatory classification, are usually not applicable to SDPPI.
Ordinary USB-C cables, Micro-USB cables, fast charging cables with E-Marker chips (E-Marker is a small chip in USB-C cables used to negotiate fast charging power, and it is a wired protocol chip related to power supply), and pure physical adapters usually fall into this category. Many people ask whether cables with PD and PPS fast charging require certification. These power supply protocols alone usually do not trigger SDPPI.
However, if the product integrates USB Ethernet, network terminals, wireless communication modules, PLC, or integrates active wired communication functions that require verification, it cannot be excluded just as a “charging cable” or “adapter”, and the equipment category and technical requirements should be further verified.
Similarly, several invalid judgment bases should be avoided: you cannot directly determine that certification is required just because the cable has a USB-C interface, supports PD/PPS, or has “smart” or “expansion” in its name; nor can you draw a conclusion only by appearance or name just because it has a wired Ethernet interface. It must still be judged in combination with actual functions and official requirements.
If you are unsure, collect the bill of materials/chip description, function definition/user manual, and interface transmission protocol description to make a preliminary judgment.
Wireless Chargers (High Misjudgment Category)
Wireless chargers are the category that people ask about the most and have the highest misjudgment rate. Many people think that all wireless chargers must have SDPPI certification, but that is not the case.
The preliminary conclusion is: if they only use standards such as Qi and PMA for electromagnetic induction power supply, do not contain regulated radio or telecommunications communication functions, and are confirmed not to be telecommunications equipment requiring certification under current regulatory classification, they are usually not applicable to SDPPI. Here is a quick judgment tip: check the product manual or parameter page to see if there are descriptions such as APP connection, Bluetooth pairing, NFC identification, or networked control. If there are none at all, it is most likely a power-supply-focused wireless charger, but it should still be verified in combination with specific implementation and current rules.
You should be careful here: there may be communication signals for power supply negotiation in the power supply control of Qi wireless chargers. Such signals usually cannot be directly equated with telecommunications communication using radio spectrum, but whether certification is involved still needs to be verified in combination with the specific implementation of the product, whether it contains other regulated communication functions, equipment category, and Indonesia’s current technical requirements. You cannot default to certain exemption or certain requirement.
If the wireless charger integrates communication or identification functions such as Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, NFC, FM, or cellular networks, or APP interaction relies on these actual communication modules (such as adjusting power or setting timers via Bluetooth or Wi-Fi), then key verification is required. A mere promotional concept of “supports APP” without corresponding communication hardware in the product cannot be used alone to determine that SDPPI is required.
Several common invalid judgments should be avoided: you cannot think certification is required just because the name is “wireless charger” or “smart wireless charger”, nor can you think it is not required just because there is no external antenna, and even less can you get direct exemption just because there is Qi certification — Qi is a charging standard and cannot replace the judgment of Indonesia’s telecommunications equipment certification.
If you are unsure, you need to collect the wireless power supply solution specification, communication function description/module model, and user manual/parameter table to confirm whether there are regulated communication functions.
In-Vehicle and Mobile Charging Products
The preliminary conclusion for in-vehicle charging and mobile charging products (such as car chargers, power banks) is: if they only perform pure voltage conversion or energy storage power supply, have no regulated communication functions, and are confirmed not to be telecommunications equipment requiring certification under current regulatory classification, they are usually not applicable to SDPPI.
Ordinary cigarette lighter USB car chargers and power banks without any wireless functions usually fall into this category.
If the product has FM transmission function, Bluetooth voice function, Wi-Fi, or has cellular or NFC functions such as positioning and identity identification, key verification is required. You cannot automatically exclude certification obligations just because the main purpose of the product is charging.
Do not fall into these pitfalls: you cannot directly judge just because the product name contains “in-vehicle”, “power bank”, or “2-in-1 wireless charger”, nor can you only look at the main purpose. As long as there are regulated communication functions, you must check the equipment category, technical requirements, and current certification rules.
If you are unsure, collect the function list/module model and wireless parameter description to make a preliminary judgment.
Smart Charging Peripherals (Power Strips/Charging Cabinets)
The preliminary conclusion for smart charging peripherals such as power strips with charging ports and shared charging cabinets is: if they only have charging ports, have no regulated communication functions, and are confirmed not to be telecommunications equipment requiring certification under current regulatory classification, they are usually not applicable to SDPPI.
If the product has Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, cellular network remote control functions, or has NFC identity identification (for example, shared charging cabinets have built-in wireless communication modules for networked billing), key verification is required.
Similarly, do not think certification is required just because the name contains “shared” or “smart”, nor do you think it is not required just because it has a charging function — the core still depends on the actual communication hardware, equipment category, and current technical requirements.
If you are unsure, you need to collect the function configuration description/communication module model and operation mode description (such as the networking method of shared charging cabinets) to judge.
Judgment Rules for Special Scenarios
In addition to the judgment of individual products, there are several rules for special scenarios that people often confuse, so we will also clarify them together.
Rules for Accessories Sold as Bundles/In Sets
Many people think “my product is an accessory sold together with the whole device, so I don’t need to do SDPPI separately” — this is actually wrong. The core principle is: accessories are not automatically exempt just because they are sold as a bundle, in a set, or with the whole device.
Specifically, several dimensions need to be verified: Is the accessory itself a telecommunications equipment requiring certification? Will it be imported separately, sold separately, and have an independent model? How is it declared during import declaration? Are there clauses that meet the bundle exemption?
For example: for a set of Bluetooth earphones plus a charging case, the Bluetooth earphones themselves need to be evaluated for SDPPI, but whether the pure charging case is applicable must be checked based on its own functions, equipment category, and current rules. It cannot be automatically exempt or automatically required just because it is sold with the earphones.
Relationship Between Wireless Module Certification and Whole Device Certification
Many people say “the communication module I use already has SDPPI certification, so the whole device doesn’t need it” — this is also wrong. The core principle is: the SDPPI certification of a module cannot automatically replace the certification of the whole device.
If you want to reference the module’s certificate, several conditions must be met: first, regulations allow referencing the module certificate; second, the module’s limiting conditions (such as antenna type, RF parameters, software version, installation method) are completely consistent with those used in the whole device, then it is possible to reference. Moreover, Indonesia does not have a general rule that “module certification can simplify the process”. Whether it can be simplified and how to do it shall be subject to the current application requirements.
Review Rules for Model Changes in the Same Series
Many sellers get certification for one model, and then change something in the same series later, not knowing whether they need to redo it. The core principle is: as long as the change affects communication functions or RF parameters, the applicability and the coverage of the certificate must be re-evaluated.
What changes must be reviewed? For example, changing the communication module, changing the antenna, modifying RF parameters, firmware changes that affect communication functions, or adding/reducing communication functions — all these need to be rechecked.
If only the charging power, number of non-communication interfaces, shell color, packaging, etc. are changed, it may not affect the RF part, but you cannot assert in advance that no review is required. You must still confirm whether a change, supplement, or re-application is required against current model coverage, certificate change, and testing requirements, and obtain confirmation from the certification body.
Avoiding Common Misjudgment Pitfalls
We have mentioned many misconceptions scattered earlier. Here are the five most common ones listed together for you to avoid pitfalls:
1. Wireless power supply = SDPPI required: Incorrect. Wireless chargers with pure wireless power supply and no regulated communication functions usually do not trigger SDPPI solely due to the power supply method, but still need to be verified in combination with specific implementation, equipment category, and current rules. Products with actual communication modules such as Bluetooth and Wi-Fi, as well as boundary cases such as Qi control communication, require separate verification.
2. USB-C/PD/E-Marker = SDPPI required: Incorrect. When these interfaces, wired fast charging protocols, and wired protocol chips are used solely for power supply or ordinary data transmission between devices, they usually do not trigger SDPPI solely due to these functions. If the product also includes USB Ethernet, network terminals, or other active communication functions, it cannot be entirely excluded as a USB-C fast charging product, and the final confirmation must still be combined with official classification.
3. Module has certification = whole device does not need certification: Incorrect. Module certification only covers the limited conditions of the module itself. Whether it can be applied to the whole device depends on regulatory requirements and the actual situation of the whole device, and automatic exemption is not allowed.
4. Has FCC/CE certification = no need for SDPPI: Incorrect. Overseas certifications cannot directly replace local Indonesian SDPPI certification. Even with FCC and CE test reports, whether they are accepted depends on Indonesia’s current regulatory requirements.
5. Wireless function can be turned off = no need for SDPPI: Incorrect. As long as the hardware has regulated communication capabilities and the product falls under the equipment category requiring certification, even if the function can be turned off via software, the applicability of SDPPI still needs to be evaluated — certification cannot be evaded by “turning off functions”.
Self-Inspection and Official Verification Pathways
After talking about so many judgment methods, you must be asking: how do I do self-inspection? Who do I ask for confirmation if I’m unsure? We have compiled a complete path from self-inspection to official verification.
4-Step Self-Inspection Process
Step 1: First check the hardware configuration of the product to confirm whether there are telecommunications/communication functions — do not just look at promotions, look at the actual materials and circuits.
Step 2: Determine whether the product is a telecommunications tool or telecommunications equipment defined by Indonesian regulations, and check the applicable equipment category, technical requirements, and certification method.
Step 3: Distinguish whether the product is confirmed non-applicable by regulations, falls under statutory exemption, or is a special case of temporary import, corresponding to different handling methods. Do not directly equate “not listed on a certain public list” with exemption from certification.
Step 4: If you are still in doubt, do not force it on your own. Conduct a pre-assessment through Komdigi’s current official channels or a compliance agency, and obtain written confirmation if necessary to avoid unnecessary risks in import and sales links.
Priority of Self-Inspection Evidence
During self-inspection, the priority of evidence is very important. Not all materials can be used for judgment:
• Core evidence (highest priority): Whole device bill of materials (BOM), communication module specification sheet, antenna parameters, RF test report, firmware description, interface definition — these are solid evidence at the hardware and function level, and have the most reference value.
• Auxiliary evidence (cannot be used for independent judgment): Product packaging, promotional copy, HS code, overseas certification certificates, sales pitches — these materials cannot independently prove whether a product requires SDPPI.
Materials to Prepare for Self-Inspection
If you want to do self-inspection or find an agency for evaluation, preparing these materials in advance will greatly improve efficiency:
• Basic materials: Actual product photos, SKU model, sales method (sold separately or in sets), import declaration method.
• Communication-related materials: Communication module model, chip specification sheet, supported frequency bands, transmit power, antenna parameters, firmware version, function description — these are the core.
• Auxiliary materials: HS code, overseas certification reports (such as FCC, CE), for reference only, cannot be used as judgment basis.
Official Verification Pathways
If you want to verify with official information, following these four steps is the safest:
Step 1: First confirm the current responsibilities and regulatory framework of the Ministry of Communications and Digital Affairs of Indonesia (Komdigi) and its competent authority for digital infrastructure. When checking, be sure to mark the verification date and official link. Indonesian regulations and agency names may be adjusted, so keep the sources to avoid problems later.
Step 2: Query the current telecommunications equipment certification classification, technical specifications, certification methods, and spectrum regulations. These are the core bases for judgment.
Step 3: Check the official certification database, technical requirement catalog, and formal exemption clauses. Remember to record the regulation number and effective date to ensure that the information used is currently valid.
Step 4: If you are unsure about a boundary product, you can apply for written pre-assessment, approval, or exemption documents prescribed by the competent authority, or entrust a reliable compliance agency to issue professional opinions, which is more secure.
Handling Principles for Boundary Products
For products with unclear boundaries, remember three handling principles:
First, priority is given to the latest official regulations and technical specifications. Do not judge based on product names, promotional copy, or an outdated public list.
Second, take the actual hardware functions and configuration as the core basis. Do not only look at the appearance, sales pitch, or the main purpose of the product.
Third, the HS code for import declaration must match the actual function of the product. Do not classify randomly to avoid certification, which will cause problems instead.
Other Related Compliance Items
Many people confuse SDPPI with other certifications. In fact, their regulatory dimensions are not exactly the same — they may apply simultaneously, or only some of them may apply:
• SNI certification: Indonesia’s national standard system, covering electrical safety, energy efficiency, etc., which is not the same as the telecommunications equipment and communication compliance focused on by SDPPI. Many charging products may require both SNI and SDPPI (if they have communication functions requiring certification), which need to be verified separately.
• Plug standards: Indonesia has specific specifications for household plugs, which fall under the scope of electrical safety and have nothing to do with SDPPI.
• Energy efficiency labels: Some charging products need to be affixed with energy efficiency labels. Whether it is mandatory depends on the current energy efficiency catalog, and it also has nothing to do with SDPPI.
• EMC (Electromagnetic Compatibility): EMC and spectrum management have different focuses, but tests such as EMC, spurious emissions, and immunity may already be included in the technical requirements of some telecommunications equipment certifications. For other non-telecommunications electrical products, independent EMC or electrical regulations may also apply, which need to be verified separately according to product category and current Indonesian regulations.
• Customs classification: HS code is only a reference for import declaration and cannot replace the applicability judgment of SDPPI. Do not assume that everything is fine if the HS code is classified into a category that does not require certification; problems will still arise if the actual functions do not match.
The mandatory applicability of all these related compliance items shall be subject to the latest official list and regulations of Indonesia at the current period. Even if the product requires SDPPI, it does not affect the separate verification of other compliance items, and what needs to be done must still be done.
Cases and Decision Reference
After talking about so many rules, let’s use several common product cases for practical exercise to see how to judge.
Case 1: Ordinary 65W USB-C PD Fast Charger
Known conditions: Only supports wired PD/PPS fast charging, has no regulated radio or telecommunications communication functions, pure AC-DC voltage conversion.
Judgment conclusion: If it is confirmed not to be telecommunications equipment requiring certification under current regulatory classification, it is usually not applicable to SDPPI.
Tip: Not being applicable to SDPPI does not mean no other certifications are required. For example, SNI, energy efficiency, etc., still need to be verified separately.
Case 2: Basic 15W Qi Wireless Charger
Known conditions: Only supports Qi wireless power supply, has no communication functions such as Bluetooth/Wi-Fi/NFC, no APP control.
Judgment conclusion: If it does not contain regulated radio or telecommunications communication functions, and is confirmed not to be telecommunications equipment requiring certification under current regulations, it is usually not applicable to SDPPI.
Tip: The communication signals in Qi power supply control need to be confirmed in combination with current specifications and specific implementation. Boundary products are best reviewed again, and other compliance items should also be checked.
Case 3: 15W Wireless Charger with Bluetooth APP Control
Known conditions: Supports Qi power supply, has a built-in Bluetooth module, can connect to a mobile APP to adjust power and set timers.
Judgment conclusion: The applicability of SDPPI needs key verification, because Bluetooth is a wireless communication function. It is necessary to check the specific equipment category, communication parameters, technical requirements, and current certification rules.
Tip: Other compliance items also need to be checked separately.
Case 4: USB-C Charging Docking Station with Wi-Fi
Known conditions: The main purpose is interface expansion and PD charging, has a built-in Wi-Fi module, no external antenna.
Judgment conclusion: Due to the built-in Wi-Fi, the applicability of SDPPI needs key verification. It cannot be determined that certification is not required just because the core purpose is charging or there is no external antenna.
Tip: Other compliance items also need to be verified.
To facilitate quick screening, we have compiled a simple decision reference table, which you can fill in for preliminary judgment:
| Judgment Dimension | Your Product’s Situation | Remarks |
| Whether it has regulated telecommunications/communication functions | Refer to the communication functions and specific implementation mentioned above | |
| Whether it falls under telecommunications tools or equipment defined by regulations | Subject to current regulations and classification by the competent authority | |
| Whether communication parameters comply with specifications | Frequency bands, power, technical standards, etc. | |
| Whether it falls under formally excluded, exempt, or temporary import situations | Need to verify applicable conditions and approval documents | |
| Preliminary conclusion | For screening only, final result is subject to the competent authority |
Note: This table is only for preliminary screening and cannot replace official judgment. The final result shall still be subject to the latest regulations, technical requirements, and judgments issued by the Ministry of Communications and Digital Affairs of Indonesia (Komdigi) and its competent authority for digital infrastructure.
Summary and Action Guidelines
Finally, let’s summarize today’s content to help you remember the core points.
First, remember a core judgment mnemonic: If there are communication functions, first check the equipment category and technical requirements; pure charging and pure wired products are usually not applicable, but confirmation must still be made based on current regulatory classification.
After learning today’s content, you should be able to independently complete the following judgments:
1. You can distinguish the regulatory differences between SDPPI and other compliance items such as SNI, and will no longer confuse them;
2. You can clearly explain that ordinary wired chargers and charging cables that do not contain regulated radio or telecommunications communication functions and are confirmed not to be telecommunications equipment requiring certification under current regulations are usually not applicable to SDPPI; at the same time, you know that USB-C is only an interface form and cannot alone determine applicability;
3. You can identify which functions require key verification: such as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, FM, cellular networks, PLC — as long as they are included, you need to be more careful;
4. You can conduct preliminary screening of boundary categories such as wireless chargers and smart charging products, and will no longer think certification is mandatory as soon as you hear “wireless charger”;
5. You can organize the evidence required for self-inspection according to priority, know how to verify the latest regulations through Komdigi’s current official channels, and will not believe what others say casually.
Finally, a reminder: all judgments shall be subject to the current regulations, technical specifications, and judgment results of the Ministry of Communications and Digital Affairs of Indonesia (Komdigi) and its competent authority for digital infrastructure. When checking regulations, be sure to mark the verification date and official source to avoid misjudgment due to policy adjustments — after all, when it comes to compliance, it is always better to be cautious.